The Cult of Charisma
EDIT: I wrote this last year and finally scheduled it to post several months ago - the fact there has since been a UK general election called for this week is entirely coincidental!
The Cult of Charisma
I’m not big on big personalities.
Now don’t get me wrong, if they are decent people, good luck
to them. The problem I have is the way in which society latches onto a big,
charismatic personality to the detriment of all else, decency included. Because
in this media driven world, it does seem to me as though being big and loud and
passionate and exciting, someone who can make a splash on the front pages and
some juicy, news-content selling headlines seems to outweigh whatever they
actually happen to do. A big personality can get away with murder in the way a
quieter soul cannot.
And this is something that seems to permeate society. Take
relationships and the great dramatic (not sure I want to call it romantic)
trope I call the thrill. It happens over and over again in TV drama,
soaps especially – a person in a stable, loving relationship, with a stable,
loving partner abandons it all for a splashy, passionate affair with someone,
quite often, they don’t even like. But it’s passionate and that’s what
matters – it’s big and it’s exciting. Who cares about all the lives that
person’s life and all those around them will be ruined? Who cares that their
life would have been so much happier with the loving, stable partner? Less
thrilling and less passionate to be sure – but what happens when the passion
wears off?
And the problem is, it feels like too many people see a TV
drama and mistake it for real life. The same trope repeated over and over
again, just as in the Realm, becomes normal life. And the media tells us we
should be looking for passion in a partner. Not someone who is safe and
stable and will care about us and stick by us – a friend as well as a partner.
No, that’s dull, they say, we need excitement and thrill. And
then the passion and excitement and thrill wears off and unlike in a soap, when
a troublesome ex will simply be dispatched to Manchester or abroad for some
unrealistically fast job opportunity, real people have to live with the
consequences.
So why is it considered bad not to be a big personality? Why
is being a sane, sensible, decent human being no longer considered enough?
Simply put, the media. There’s no story in being decent, there’s no drama in
being sensible. In TV drama, a nice, sensible character is considered dull –
hence the majority are unrealistically overblown. In the world at large,
personality is key - if the media can’t make money off the back of you, then
you aren’t any use. You aren’t worth the trouble. They will therefore either
try and push you to one side for a more interesting character or ignore you
entirely.
The place in which this makes me most angry is politics. I
shall just stress – this is a general observation. I have no particular
political affiliation, I don’t have any especial drum to bang, I take various
politicians as I find them and judge them on that. But the cult of charisma in
politics drives me nuts. Because if there is one area that should never be
about being a big personality, it’s government. I can think of example
after example both here and abroad where the big, flashy personality is chosen
over a sensible but dull rival, as though being charismatic makes one a better
leader than someone quiet and competent. And the media laud every antic of the
big flashy one (because they sell more papers) while either ignoring the rivals
or deriding them as the ultimate insult - boring.
I just do not understand boring as an insult in this context
at all. Because, simply put, boring is the insult the media use when that
person doesn’t make them money. But why should it be a put down to the rest of
us? To me, boring is not necessarily a bad thing - the opposite even. Because
from where I’m standing, gazing back at history, I would take every day of the
week, month or year someone who is quiet and dull and gets on with the job
without making a splash or overexciting the media over some big, flashy
charismatic somebody who is so busy being big and flashy and charismatic and
somebody that they can’t actually do the job at all. To me, a quiet person who
isn’t interested in selling themselves and how they come across is far more
likely to be focussed on doing things right than someone whose entire
being is focussed on being a personality.
As a society, I do feel we badly need to get over the cult
of charisma. That we need to shake off the media grip on how we view the world.
I think it would do the world a lot of favours. But unfortunately, the true
irony is we’d probably only do so if the media told us to…
Comments
Post a Comment